u`5 P5 @@@ @@@@al4HI @5 EN DB 6P     & .K/ < Y 1 fDlvi2kV Alavi19920 Arthur Jr1994" Bakes2002" Bauer20020 Bennett19942Bhargava1994, Bloom1996  Cao2000& Carson1990  Chau1999  Dennis1996! Dennis2001# Dennis2001 Devaraj2003" Dickson2002, Erez1996  Esteves2003. Evans1995' Farley19900  Fisher1983- Gilliland1995 Gitelson1983 Glass1976 Grover2003 Haley1996 Hall20010 Heine2003 Hunter1990/ Hunter199443 Hunter1994 Hwang1990 Hwang1996 Hwang1996 Hwang1998 Hwang2000 Jackson1985Joachimsthaler1992) Johnson1998.Kanetkar19952 Kayande19941 Khalili1994 Kohli2003" LaGanke2002+ Langhorne1997/ Law1994' Lehmann1990 Li1997 Lim2004 Lipsey2001 Liu2004 Ma2004 Mahmood2001Malhotra2003% Malinak19895 Malinak1989(Marin-Martinez1998 Marshalll McLean1996 McLeod1992 Montazemi19884 Montazemi1988 Nah2000 Ones1995a) Oswald1998 Palvia2002 Palvia2002  Pettingell Premkumar2003 Pryor2000 Ramos2003 Remington Richardson2004 Roberts2004 Rosenthal1979- Russell1995' Rust1990* Sanchez1998( Sanchez-Meca1998 Schmidt1990/ Schmidt19943 Schmidt1994& Schriesheim1990 Schuler1985 Sharma19971 Shashaani1994" Sherman2002 Siau2000+Slattery19977%Sullivan19895Sullivan1989Swanberg2001  Vandenberg1996! Vandenberg2001 Viswesvaran1995* Viswesvaran1998 Wang19884 Wang1988% Wanous19895 Wanous1989 Wilson2001 Windsor2000Witworth2002! Wixom2001# Wixom2001 Wolf1986 Wu19909 Yetton1997 AuthorsbJournals Keywords !                                 b Alavi, M.Arthur Jr, WinfredBakes, Boris B.Bauer, Cara C.Bennett, WinstonBhargava, MukeshBloom, Matthew C. Cao, Q. Cao, QingCarson, Kenneth P.Chau, P. Y. K. Dennis, A. R. Devaraj, S.Dickson, Marcus W. Erez, Amir Esteves, J.Evans, Martin G.Farley, John U. Fisher, C. D.Gilliland, Stephen W. Gitelson, R. Glass, G. Glass, G. V. Grover, V. Haley, B. J. Hall, L. Heine, M. L. Hunter, J. E.Hunter, John E. Hwang, M. I. Jackson, S.E.Joachimsthaler, E. A.Johnson, Jeff W.Kanetkar, VinayKayande, UjwalKhalili, Ahmad Kohli, R.LaGanke, Jacqueline S.Langhorne, PeterLaw, Kenneth S.Lehmann, Donald R. Li, E.Y. Lim, J. Lipsey, M. W. Liu, L. Ma, Q.Mahmood, M. A.Malhotra, M. K.Malinak, JoyceMarin-Martinez, Fulgencio Marshall, T. McLean, E. R.McLeod, Poppy LaurettaMontazemi, A. R. Nah, F. F.Nah, Fiona Fui-Hoon Ones, D.S.Oswald, Frederick L. Palvia, P.C.Palvia, S.C.J.Pettingell, K. Premkumar, G. Pryor, A. Ramos, I. Remington, W.Richardson, V.J. Roberts, T.L. Rosenthal, R.Russell, Craig J.Rust, Roland T.Sanchez, Juan I.Sanchez-Meca, JulioSchmidt, F. L.Schmidt, Frank L.Schriesheim, Chester A. Schuler, R.S. Sharma, R.Sharma, RajeevShashaani, LilySherman, Michael P. Siau, K. Siau, Keng Slattery, JimSullivan, Sherry E.Swanberg, D.L.Vandenberg, R. J.Viswesvaran, C.Viswesvaran, Chokalingam Wang, S.Wanous, John P. Wilson, D. B.Windsor, J. C.Witworth, J.E.Wixom, Barabara H. Wolf, F. M. Wu, B.J.P. Yetton, P.Yetton, Philip  ,)Educational and Psychological MeasurementEducational Researcher Human-Computer Interaction Information and Management,(Information Resources Management Journal Information Systems Research Journal of Applied Psychology,)Journal of Management Information Systems Journal of Marketing Research40Journal of Organizational and End User Computing@;Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce MIS QuarterlyOmeaOmega84Organizational Behavior and Human Decision ProcessesPersonnel PsychologyTQProceedings of the 29th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System SciencesPsychological Bulletin41The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems        @ 20" & #!, 3.21+/4) -'(*%5 ),4hMcLeod, Poppy Lauretta 1992rlAn Assessment of the Experimental Literature on Electronic Support of Group Work: Results of a Meta-Analysis Human-Computer Interaction7 3t 257, 24 pages Montazemi, A. R. Wang, S. 1988f_The Effects of Modes of Information Presentation on Decision-Making: A review and meta-analysisp0)Journal of Management Information Systems 5t35 101, 27 pages 19885744218E Montazemi, A. R. Wang, S.of`The Effects of Modes of Information Presentation on Decision-Making: A Review and Meta-Analysis.0)Journal of Management Information Systems1988/12//Winter88/895I3IArticles 101m M.E. Sharpe Inc.07421222This study investigates the impact of modes of information presentation on information dimensions. Twenty-four published studies were reviewed. The results of sixteen of these were cumulated by application of meta-analysis technique. The ensuing results demonstrate that the bar presentation format is slightly better than the tabular one in terms of information precision; however, the face chart is superior to the tabular format with respect to relevancy, and the multicolor presentation is more relevant than the monocolor. In addition, two factors of influence (moderators) were verified. First, personality, which is classified as field-dependent and field-independent, acts as a moderator between color and information relevancy. Second, when comparing line graphical presentations with tabular, task environment has a moderate effect on both timesaving and precision.ABSTRACT FROM AUTHORINFORMATION science DECISION-making INFORMATION resources management BUSINESS enterprises INFORMATION resources META-analysis PSYCHOMETRICS graphics in information systems. Information mediaTY - GEN Accession Number: 5744218; Montazemi, A. R. 1Wang, S. 2; Affiliations: 1: Assistant Professor of Information Systems, McMaster University. 2: Faculty of Business, McMaster University.; Source Information: Winter88/89, Vol. 5 Issue 3, p101; Thesaurus Term: INFORMATION scienceThesaurus Term: DECISION-makingThesaurus Term: INFORMATION resources managementThesaurus Term: BUSINESS enterprises; Subject Term: INFORMATION resourcesSubject Term: META-analysisSubject Term: PSYCHOMETRICS; Author-Supplied Keyword: graphics in information systems.Author-Supplied Keyword: Information media; Number of Pages: 27p; Document Type: Articlerb[http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=cookie,ip,url,uid&db=buh&an=57442182 199812130456,%Oswald, Frederick L. Johnson, Jeff W.,On the Robustness, Bias, and Stability of Statistics From Meta-Analysis of Correlation Coefficients: Some Initial Monte Carlo Findings.o$Journal of Applied Psychology 1998/04//N832TArticle:164-178( ("American Psychological Association00219010Each of several Monte Carlo simulations generated 100 sets of observed study correlations based on normal, heteroscedastic, or slightly nonlinear bivariate distributions, with one population correlation coefficient and true variance of 0. A version of J. E. Hunter and F. L. Schmidt's (1990b) meta-analysis was applied to each study set. Within simulations, ˆ was accurate on average. ˆ[sup 2, sub ] was biased; one would correctly conclude more than half the time that no moderator effects existed. However, cases of variation in ˆ and especially in ˆ[sup 2, sub ] indicated that results from individual meta-analyses could deviate substantially from what was found on average. Findings for these no-moderator cases offer applied psychologists some guidelines and cautions when drawing conclusions about true population correlations and true moderator effects (e.g., situational specificity, validity generalization) from meta-analytic results.ABSTRACT FROM AUTHORpjMONTE Carlo method CORRELATION (Statistics) VARIANCES SIMULATION methods META-analysis PSYCHOLOGY, AppliedAccession Number: 12130456; Oswald, Frederick L. 1 Email Address: oswa0019@gold.tc.umn.eduJohnson, Jeff W. 2; Affiliations: 1: University of Minnesota 2: Personal Decisions Research Institutes; Source Information: Apr98, Vol. 83 Issue 2, p164; Thesaurus Term: MONTE Carlo methodThesaurus Term: CORRELATION (Statistics)Thesaurus Term: VARIANCES; Subject Term: SIMULATION methodsSubject Term: META-analysisSubject Term: PSYCHOLOGY, Applied; Number of Pages: 15p; Illustrations: 8 charts; Document Type: Articleb\http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=cookie,ip,url,uid&db=buh&an=121304560*Palvia, P.C. Palvia, S.C.J. Witworth, J.E. 2002B8The "file drawer problem" and tolerance for null resultsPsychological Bulletin86638-641  $!ACADEMIC achievementANALYSIS of varianceBUSINESS enterprisesCOMPUTER programs0+COMPUTER-assisted instruction -- EvaluationCORRELATION (Statistics)DECISION-makingESTIMATION theory$ graphics in information systems.Information mediaINFORMATION resources$ INFORMATION resources managementINFORMATION science JUDGMENTMEASUREMENT errors META-analysis META-analysis -- EvaluationMODERATOR variablesMONTE Carlo methodORGANIZATIONAL behaviorPOPULATION -- StatisticsPOPULATION forecastingPOPULATION parametersPSYCHOLOGY, AppliedPSYCHOLOGY, Industrial PSYCHOMETRICSREGRESSION (Psychology)RESEARCH -- Methodology SAMPLE sizeSAMPLING (Statistics)SIMULATION methods STATISTICS VARIANCES #!  & "0 SAMPLE size STATISTICS&Alavi, M. Joachimsthaler, E. A.s 1992haRevisiting implementation research: A meta-analysis of literature and suggestions for researcherss MIS Quarterlya161 95-116 1994 9411163945*#Arthur Jr, Winfred Bennett, Winston\UChoice of software and programs in meta-analysis research: Does it make a difference?.'Educational & Psychological Measuremente 1994///Autumn 543Article  776F Sage Publications Inc.00131644Investigates the effect of choice of data analysis programs on meta-analysis study outcomes. Meta-analysis software programs' identical results; Small differences in values obtained from programs; Lack of influence on meta-analytic outcomes.4-COMPUTER programs META-analysis -- Evaluationp,%Accession Number: 9411163945; Arthur Jr, WinfredBennett, Winston; Source Information: Autumn94, Vol. 54 Issue 3, p776; Thesaurus Term: COMPUTER programs; Subject Term: META-analysis -- Evaluation; Number of Pages: 12p; Illustrations: 1 chart; Document Type: Article; Full Text Word Count: 4614Bd^http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=cookie,ip,url,uid&db=buh&an=9411163945b\Bakes, Boris B. Dickson, Marcus W. Sherman, Michael P. Bauer, Cara C. LaGanke, Jacqueline S. 2002PJComputer-Mediated Communication and Group Decision Making: A Meta-Analysis:4Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes871 156, 24 pages.(Cao, Qing Nah, Fiona Fui-Hoon Siau, Keng 2000b[A meta-analysis of relationship modeling accuracy: comparing relational and semantic models2+America's Conference on Information SystemsR Longbeatch, CA470-4730*Carson, Kenneth P. Schriesheim, Chester A. 1990B8Test of Two Refinements in Procedures for Meta-Analysis.$Journal of Applied Psychologyo 1994/12// 796hArticle978-986a ("American Psychological Association00219010& This study used Monte Carlo simulation to examine the increase in accuracy resulting from 2 statistical refinements of the interactive Schmidt-Hunter procedures for meta-analysis: the use of the mean correlation instead of individual correlations in the estimation of sampling error variance, and a procedure that takes into account the nonlinear nature of the range-restriction correction. In all of the cases examined, these refinements increased the accuracy of the interactive procedure in estimating the variance of population correlations and resulted in more accuracy than other procedures examined. The use of the mean correlation in the sampling error variance formula also increased the accuracy of variance estimates for the multiplicative and Taylor Series procedures.ABSTRACT FROM AUTHORrlMONTE Carlo method CORRELATION (Statistics) ESTIMATION theory META-analysis MEASUREMENT errors PSYCHOMETRICSAccession Number: 12361547; Law, Kenneth S. 1Schmidt, Frank L. 2 Email Address: frank.schmidt@uiowa.eduHunter, John E. 3; Affiliations: 1: Department of Management, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong. 2: Department of Management and Organization, College of Business, University of Iowa. 3: Department of Psychology, Michigan State University.; Source Information: Dec94, Vol. 79 Issue 6, p978; Thesaurus Term: MONTE Carlo methodThesaurus Term: CORRELATION (Statistics)Thesaurus Term: ESTIMATION theory; Subject Term: META-analysisSubject Term: MEASUREMENT errorsSubject Term: PSYCHOMETRICS; Number of Pages: 9p; Document Type: Articleb\http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=cookie,ip,url,uid&db=buh&an=12361547Li, E.Y. 1997f`Perceived importance of information system success factors: a meta-analysis of group differences Information and Management32 15-28L,&Lim, J. Richardson, V.J. Roberts, T.L. 2004NGInformation technology investment and firm performance: a meta-analysisXQProceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences Hawaii 1-10"Lipsey, M. W. Wilson, D. B. 2001Practical Meta-Analysisi Thousand Oaks, CA3 Sage PublicationsA 246dMa, Q. Liu, L. 2004LFThe technology acceptance model: a meta-analysis of empirical findings60Journal of Organizational and End User Computing161e 59-72;,&Mahmood, M. A. Hall, L. Swanberg, D.L. 2001b[Factors affecting information technology usage: a meta-analysis of the empirical literaturetB;Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce112107-130